I strongly agree with this statement because : the intensity of the problem would have gone down when final verdict is given.. those who had committed the crime are being given a chance to hide evidences that are against them and commit further crimes citizens will not have hope on judiciary systems The case of 26/11 is an standing example.This gives no meaning to those men who laid down their lives to the save the country when the whole world knows who has committed the crime. Exchange of talks between india and Pakistan has not produced any significant result

spelling is not correct.

i dont think that another person is made prisoned. its all political rumors that congress is spreading so that actual person be released.

good but those upon whom a false case has been made . this statement becomes false because they get enough time to prove them innocent.

jus for information... can u say wat is 26-11 case...

i think its very true justice delayed is justice denied because if a person gets justice when he no longer needs it then we can say it s justice denied. here is an example, a person has filed a case to become a college principal, he got justice after 20 years. that was the time 9 days less than his retirement age. so clearly we can say he didn't get justice at all. justice is denied for him.

i believe in you guys but, as i observed that lot of criminal case and other cases appears in society daily which should be processed.It is a tedious job handle all.also if justice is made without listening to both group completely result will be faulty or one sided.thus proper care is made while making a decision which causes a bit delay.even though critical issues must processed quickly because with delay justice looses its strength

our judicial system is based on facts and proofs,it doesn't consider morals. judicial system that cares only about evidences and facts shouldn’t worry about taming the souls of the plaintiff and the defendant with time rather give justice as quick as it can, this delay/denial of justice leads to increasing "Out of Court settlements" which are cheaper and quicker thereby leading to the loss of trust in our Judicial System.it has been mentioned in article 39-A of the constitution that direct the states to secure equal justice and free legal aid for the citizens.bt the state has been failed in providing this.The justice delivery system is on the verge of collapse with more than 30 million cases clogging the system. In Jessica Lal’s case the situation is even more tragic because justice may never be done. She was shot dead in a Delhi bar in full view of several people. It was on the basis of their statements that the police built their case against Manu Sharma and he, himself, fled the crime scene and remained on the run for days, something he would have been unlikely to do had he been innocent. But, as time went by, witnesses to the murder suddenly became unable to identify him as the killer so he is already out on bail and will probably remain free and go on to a long and successful career as a politician.so we can say that justice delayed is justice denied.

yes it is also right that our justice donot consider the past charachter....i have seen many cases.A man accuses for more than one case but his case is running through the last five year. The court did not consider the moral values and they canot place the person from their charachter..

it is very glad to learn this topic from these site

excellent.............

It is very unfortunate for our judicial system that people are not satified very their lazy and corrupted system. As we all know that due to this slow process of judicial system many people do not punish for their crimes.,it is type of cuse on our society.So we want to fast our pocedure

i too agree with that point... justice delayed is justice denied...since there is no use of getting judgement when it is delayed.... we lost our time too...

I completely agree with priya justice has been denied because of its delay and lack of performance. These days out court settlements are incline due to the mistrust over judiciary. Moreover that many political cases are being prolonged due to the entrance of politicians and there man & money power. A poor man can hardly reach reach to a court and file petition and get justice. Today one has to feel ashamed to agree that justice has been covered under the hands of money and power.

justice is delayed because the judicial system wants to deny justice. It seems dat the judicial system blivs in money and man power (politics).we have present example of ruchika case, how Mr.Rathod has used his powers.when "rakshak becomes bakshak " then who will in dis judiciary system.

Yes of course it should be. If justice delayed it must be denied because in a delayed justice the victim found a chance to hide his crime . Its very good example have been in the "Aarusi" case recently. The CBI gave clean chit to all victim and said that it was a sucide case however they preveasly arrested his father Mr Talwar in this case. So it is clear that it is not totely true justice.

There are thousands of cases pending in courts. That will require a generation of court to solve. The pending cases must either be deleted. Or they should be solved by employing more number of judges and courts

I really agree with all of you, but in my opinion some rules must be passed in order to provide proper justice to innocent people like according to the seriousness of the crime the case should be closed as soon as possible and final decision should be given within allocated time.

I completely agree with all of the above discussion , since any justice if not given verdict instantly would not be either useful for the accused and not for the citizens of these country. As you have already seen in our bollywood movies if the justice is delayed or denied as in a movie a famous dialogue "Tarrik pe Tarrik" then the accused or their relatives may turn themselves into criminals for taking the revenge themselves and they obviously in future will not trust in justice by government or by courts............